21st century trading

Gates Cambridge profiles my contribution to a book published last week:

The report, Capital Account Regulations and the Trading System: a Compatibility Review, released by the Global Development and Environment Institute at Tufts University, the Center for the Study of State and Society in Buenos Aires and Boston University’s Pardee Centre, reveals that US trade and investment treaties are the most constraining in terms of granting nations the policy space to regulate cross-border finance, and suggests that nations should refrain from taking on new commitments without the proper safeguards to put strong regulation in place.

One of the chapters of the report is written by Gates Cambridge Scholar Todd Tucker [2012], who is doing PhD in Development Studies.

The report is the second publication of Boston University’s Pardee Center Task Force on Regulating Capital Flows for Long-Run Development, and builds on the Task Force’s first report published in March 2012. The new report is the outcome of a workshop co-sponsored last June in Buenos Aires, Argentina with the Centre for the Study of State and Society (CEDES) in Argentina and GDAE.  The Task Force, which is co-chaired by GDAE’s Kevin P. Gallagher and Leonardo E. Stanley of the Center for the Study of State and Society in Buenos Aires, consists of former and current Central Bank officials, IMF and WTO staff, members of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, as well as scholars and members of civil society.

It was initially convened in September 2011 as consensus was emerging that the global financial crisis had re-confirmed the need to regulate cross-border finance. The first report argues that international financial institutions – and in particular the International Monetary Fund – need to support measures that would allow capital account regulations (CARs) to become a standard part of economic policy. However, it states that some policymakers and academics have expressed concern that many nations — and especially developing countries — may not have the flexibility to adequately deploy such regulations because of the trade and investment treaties they are party to.

Todd, who was research director at Public Citizen focusing on trade and investment issues, says: “These agreements were written by a handful of financial sector lobbyists and bureaucrats in the 1990s, before we really understood the perils of deregulation. Our task force will be traveling to Geneva, DC, Beijing and beyond to advise policymakers on how to upgrade 20th century trade rules for 21st century financial realities.”

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s