New article II

Nicole Janz @PolSciReplicate, Michael @Colaresi and I have new articles in the International Studies Perspectives journal’s special symposium on replication and transparency in academic research. Recent scandals over questionable research underscore the importance of the topic.

Here’s the abstract for my article, which looks at an oft-neglected aspect of the transparency debate:

The paradigm wars between quantitative and qualitative methodologists have focused on the validity and reliability of theory testing, with increasing concerns for transparency in both types of work. But not all research topics lend themselves to theory testing and, rather, require the generation of new theoretical concepts. The relative lack of attention to the “why” and “how” of qualitative theory generation has stunted innovation, forcing scholars to avoid such work or “reinvent the wheel” rather than build on community accomplishments. This article shows that grounded theory methods from sociology provide useful techniques for theory generation and can help scholars break through theoretical muddles. These methods have the added benefit of utilizing a workflow management that lends itself to more transparency than is common in much qualitative work. This article concludes by suggesting steps to boost transparency for grounded theory in international relations and push out the knowledge frontier.

Nils Weidmann has a concluding article where he expands on these ideas:

Because of the problems that might arise in extending replication to data generation
and management, most contributors agree that for quantitative analyses, the replication material should include the replication data set and code to generate tables and figures. For qualitative analysis, replication is considerably more difficult. Some of the articles in this forum provide helpful suggestions for improving transparency at various stages of the research process. Tucker (2016) proposes to apply grounded theory used for theory building in sociology to inter national relations research. Although this does not imply that more, and other types of, replication material would be distributed along with the article, it does mean that the article itself will be much more detailed when it comes to the statements from which theory is derived.
I highly recommend all the pieces in the symposium forum, which brings together papers presented at the 2014 International Studies Association annual meetings in Toronto. Nicole organized both endeavors with Nils Petter Gleditsch. Alexia Katsanidou, Laurence Horton, Uwe Jensen, and Fernando Martel García also made contributions.
The idea for my article came out of a replication workshop I took with Nicole. The piece started off as a replication of a quantitative analysis on investment treaty outcomes, and ended up a conceptual piece on qualitative research.
If you’re interested in further reading on grounded theory, one of the creators of the school (Anselm Strauss) and Juliet Corbin have a comprehensive “how to” book from 1998. Josh Karton applies grounded theory to contract arbitration research. And Jorg Friedrichs and Friedrich Kratochwil have a great piece on methodological pragmatism in qualitative research more generally, a tradition of which grounded theory is a part.
Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s